contractually bound to pay, cannot be considered to be a valid offer of possession. Moreover, no offer for possession was made in the possession letter ... final demand notice dated 25.03.2017 cannot be considered to be a valid offer of possession.
8. Since no valid offer of possession of the flat
offer was accepted, as stated hereinabove,
the validity of the bid/offer of this appellant was extended lastly up to
10th April, 2012 and offer ... offer cannot be resulted into
a valid contract because there was no valid acceptance of the offer at
all on 12th April, 2012. The offer
section 271(1)(c) , any person, who failed to offer valid explanation, the
amount added directly on indirectly to the total income of an assessee ... section 271(1)(c) any person, who fails to offer valid explanation in
respect of any addition, the amount added directly or indirectly
down the legal position very clearly
that a subsequent higher offer is no valid
ground for refusing confirmation of a sale or
offer already made ... comes to the conclusion that
the price offered is adequate, no subsequent
higher offer can constitute a valid ground for
refusing confirmation of the sale
Training
(SBTET) need to be treated as equally valid, like
any other regular diploma offered by the State
Board of Technical Education and Training
(SBTET ... secured
Diplomas through CCC mode is that once they hold a valid
Diploma offered by SBTET and recognized by the Government
of Andhra Pradesh, they
Rammohansingh Badshahsingh Tomar vs Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal on 6 September, 2018
Author: Harsha Devani
findings of the Settlement Commission on fulfillment of
requirements of a valid offer in orders passed under Section
Page 25 of 26
C/SCA/4321
hereby advised, in your own interest, to obtain/sponsor/give valid offers, in the prescribed manner, for the said property in question ... fall or neglect to sponsor/give, in the prescribed manner, any valid offer (s) for the respective property in question or pay the outstanding dues
accused in the Investigating
Officer was not sufficient to presume that valid offer was given by
the Investigating Officer to the accused in terms
chemical examination and the seal
remained with the police official and valid offer was not given as the
Investigating Officer also included himself as being
