fraud alleged is this; Before the second marrigae, appellant (husband) had undergone vasectomy , but he did not disclose it to the respondent (wife ... know the reason. Appellant then divulged to her that he had undergone vasectomy before marrigae. But he pacified her that he would undergo recanalisation. However
requested Mr. N.V. Antony to ascertain whether the respondent had undergone vasectomy as he had three children and all are fairly grown ... parents were assured that he has not undergone vasectomy. Even-after living with respondent with regular carnal copulation for nearly two years, petitioner
children were born to them out of this wedlook. The respondent underwent vasectomy operation on 8-1-1976. Thereafter the appellant and respondent lived together ... given evidence to the effect that in 1976, January, he underwent vasectomy operation. On 20-8-1978 he took his wife to her house
born, the petitioner-husband is said to have undergone a bilateral vasectomy operation on 27-7-1976. According to the petitioner he thereby lost ... wife. According to her the petitioner was behaving cruelly towards her, the vasectomy operation undergone by the petitioner was not effective, because of that
consulted a Surgeon to
see the possibility of the first plaintiff undergoing Vasectomy. It
appears that they were given the impression that Vasectomy was
final ... defendant's
contract with the plaintiffs was to perform a vasectomy
operation on the first plaintiff with reasonable skill and
care rather than
both of
them had been resided together. He had already undergone
vasectomy prior to his marriage with the respondent ... marriage with the mother of the respondent,
Mr.George Vellipana had undergone Vasectomy operation on
10/08/1978. Therefore, he was not capable of begotting
properly understanding the minimum basics
of the surgical procedures involved. Non scalpel vasectomy is
not performed by gynaecologists. It is done by doctors specially
trained ... surgeon / gynaecologist / any other specialist, is permitted to
undertake no scalpel vasectomy unless and until they have
WP(C).No.15139
fraud and the husband had concealed the fact that he had undergone vasectomy and married the petitioner. The husband was a widower. According ... impotent at the time of marriage as he had undergone vasectomy and hence the consent was obtained by fraud. In that case, the respondent
Pennamma was looking after him and the children. First plaintiff had undergone vasectomy operation in 1973 as a result of which he had become crippled ... disabled man. Plaint alleges that he became disabled after a vasectomy operation. This fact was spoken to by him at the time of evidence
proved.
17. Though it was evident that the husband had undergone vasectomy operation, in the absence of any reliable material to show that the operation
