Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (1.42 seconds)

Paresh Ch. Giri vs Banabala Sasmal & Anr on 25 July, 2019

Annapurna Giri. In the year 1981, the petitioner had to undergo vasectomy operation at Block Primary Health Centre of Midnapur District. After the said vasectomy ... specifically contended that Learned Magistrate ought to have considered that after successful vasectomy operation in the year 1981, the question of becoming father
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Dharma Rani vs State And Ors on 7 March, 2019

wedlock. While the petitioner was in defence services, he also underwent vasectomy operation on 03/01/1978 which is already entered in his personal record ... reply and stated that merely because the petitioner has undergone basic vasectomy operation, it cannot be said that he has become infertile and has supported
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M C Sharma vs State And Ors on 7 March, 2019

wedlock. While the petitioner was in defence services, he also underwent vasectomy operation on 03/01/1978 which is already entered in his personal record ... reply and stated that merely because the petitioner has undergone basic vasectomy operation, it cannot be said that he has become infertile and has supported
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next