Independent Review Committee
(IRC) and few decisions of this Court, particularly, K. Veeraswami[4] and
J.A.C Saldanha[5] and struck down the Single ... under:
“34. The other decision of this Court is in K. Veeraswami. That was a
decision in which the majority held that the Prevention
Vineet Narain case is erroneous that the
Constitution Bench decision in K. Veeraswami v. Union of India
[(1991) 3 SCC 655] is not an authority ... decision runs contrary to
observations and findings contained in para 28 of Veeraswami case.
8. Having regard to the aforesaid, we are of the view
review of any such order or decree be allowed. "
7. In Veeraswami Mudali v. P.R. Venkatachala Mudali and
others1, it was held ... cases of `SITA
RAM v. RAM LAL', 18 All 440 and `VEERASWAMI v.
VENKATACHALA', AIR 1926 Mad 18. It is sufficient
to state
Mallaiah (A-61), M. Ramreddy (A-62)
and K. Veeraswamy (A-69) thought of identifying the culprits.
They called M. Yakaiah (A-16) - a Mantrik ... Vishnu
(A-66), B. Sudhakar (A-67), N. Ilumallu (A-68), K. Veeraswamy
(A-69), D. Sarangapani (A-70),B. Sampath (A-71), B.
Rayalaxmi
Vineet Narain case is erroneous that the
Constitution Bench decision in K. Veeraswami v. Union of India
[(1991) 3 SCC 655] is not an authority ... decision runs
contrary to observations and findings contained in para 28 of
Veeraswami case.
8. Having regard to the aforesaid, we are of the view
review of any such order or decree be allowed. "
7. In Veeraswami Mudali v. P.R. Venkatachala Mudali and
others1, it was held ... cases of `SITA
RAM v. RAM LAL', 18 All 440 and `VEERASWAMI v.
VENKATACHALA', AIR 1926 Mad 18. It is sufficient
to state
