which advances the
causethe cause of the derelicts.
In Vimala (K.) Vs. Veeraswamy (K.), (1991) 2 SCC 375,
dealing with the contention of husband that
constitution
Bench in K. Veeraswami vs. Union of India and ors. "{1991(3)
SCC 655} upheld the view that no sanction is required
suit would only be
obiter dicta.
However, the Madras High Court in Veeraswamy Mudali
vs. Palaniyappan and ors. (AIR 1924 Madras 626) and the
Calcutta
servant concerned. This exercise can be completed
only in the trial. [ K.Veeraswami v. Union of India (1991
(3) SCC 655; State of Maharashtra
which advances the
causethe cause of the derelicts.
In Vimala (K.) Vs. Veeraswamy (K.), (1991) 2 SCC 375,
dealing with the contention of husband that
servant concerned. This exercise can be completed
only in the trial. [ K.Veeraswami v. Union of India (1991
(3) SCC 655; State of Maharashtra