State Of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O. ... vs Ramesh Jijeba Lahane And Another on 8 December, 2014
namely, Jagan had not
been to the marriage ceremony; but then changed his version by
saying that he does not know. He stated
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 273 (0.95 seconds)Ramesh Jijeba Lahane vs State Of Maharashtra, Through P.S.O. ... on 8 December, 2014
namely, Jagan had not
been to the marriage ceremony; but then changed his version by
saying that he does not know. He stated
Cbi vs . Samay Singh Meena Etc. Page No. 1 Of 81 on 29 March, 2014
confused due to lapse
of time and categorically denied that he changed his version
on being tutored by CBI. PW-5 has also corroborated that
State vs . (1) Sonu Singh S/O. Sh. Suraj Pal Singh on 30 August, 2014
State vs . (1) Sonu Singh S/O. Sh. Suraj Pal Singh on 30 August, 2014
State vs (1)Shanu @ Shahrukh on 21 October, 2014
with his employee deceased
Sabbir, but in his crossexamination, he changed his version. In cross
examination, he stated that he was inside his house ... caught hold of Sabbir. But in his cross
examination, he completely changed his version by stating that he was
not present in his shop
State vs . Raju on 29 March, 2014
said statement, the victim S repeatedly changed her version as would be seen from
detailed reproduction of her statement hereinbelow :
".... I was earlier also ... seen that the
prosecutrix has been repeatedly changing her version with a view to save herself and to
rule out the possibility of her consent
State vs . Yamin Ali & Anr. on 25 January, 2014
their own accord on 08.03.2012.
The prosecutrix J, however, kept changing her version regarding forcible
sexual intercourse by the accused Salman. In her examination ... injury on her person. Considering that the prosecutrix J repeatedly
changed her version , she is not a trustworthy witness and even otherwise,
her testimony
State vs . Ram Kumar @ Balu on 10 December, 2014
accused) is not
correct. She stated that she could change her version on 03.10.12 as
her son was seriously ill and was admitted in hospital ... neighbouer, police official and court that she could change her
version due to threats. She had not seen the person who had
extended threats
State vs . Kanta Devi on 18 October, 2014
thereafter he never visited the matrimonial home of deceased. He
also changed the version claiming that he had visited the matrimonial
house of the deceased ... changed his statement
claiming that he had visited matrimonial home of deceased 2-3 times
subsequent to her marriage. He again changed the version claiming
State vs . Rahul Dabas & Ors. on 20 November, 2014
changed
his statement to have been given beatings by three persons and there being no
involvement of fourth person and further, subsequently changing his version ... worthy of credit who changes
FIR No.729/2006 Page No.9 to 10
his version at each and every stage according to his whims