Though the insurance company could not prove
that the complainant had changed its version in order to get over the insurance
coverage taking cue from ... liability. The insurance company contended that the
first surveyor has changed his version that the machine over turned/fell down
while it was working
reveal the condition of the patient but on 26-6-2003 changed his version and
advised to go for surgery as the condition ... team after
obtaining consent. Opposite party No.3
denied that he changed his version on 26-6-2003 and demanded
standard. Hence the complaint for compensation.
2. The opposite parties filed separate version. The 1st opposite party admitted that the complainant was brought ... assault or under the influence of alcohol. May be he changed version because taking advantage of a fall he wanted to implicate some
Towing charges, compensation, interest and costs were also
prayed.
VERSION OF THE RESPONDENTS
6. The respondents filed written reply. It was not denied that ... However, it was pleaded that DDR was lodged
with the changed version of the appellant. It was admitted that the appellant had
taken the vehicle
consumed liquor. However, subsequently said
Shri.Sudhir changed his version and in his supplementary statement
before police submitted that on enquiry he came to know ... According
to the opponent insurance company, said Shri.Sudhir Kasade has
changed his version on the say of Shri.Pratap Deshmukh who is
husband
virtually at the behest of opposite party No.3 who
changed versions to her detriment in as much as and as the complainants rights came
opposite party / appellant has stated in the version that the change of address / change of location of the factory was intimated to them ... opposite party bank / appellant would contend in their version that the intimation regarding the change of location / shifting the factory from the previous address
repudiation letter came to be negatived by
their own version in their counter wherein they changed the theme by saying
that the damage was slight ... Even otherwise, the
appellants themselves ate their own words by changing the version that the
damage in the accident was merely marginal which amounts
Roshal Lal
Chandel, Incharge Security Services, who in their earlier version dated
16.12.2007, which is at page 359 to 360 of the complaint file ... them for
their carelessness by the company, as such, they had changed their versions,
hence, their statements which were made before the Royal Associates cannot
terms and
conditions of the policy. The District Commission has totally changed
the version of the case by some hypothetical averments which have no
relevance
