Smt. Lalitha R vs Smt.Nalinakshi on 14 December, 2022
admitted that she knows Shyamala
and complainant and later on she changed version by saying that she
knows Shyamal alone. Furthermore the complainant has produced
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 3536 (1.44 seconds)The State Of Karnataka vs E. Kenchegowda on 23 March, 2020
find that he is not
consistent in his approach. His version changes from time to
time and from one stage to another stage. I would
K.A. Satish Kumar vs M/S. A.S.Krishnashetty & Sons on 20 August, 2016
also one of the notable point about the changing
version of petitioner that he has deposed during his
examination-in-chief on 16.10.1990, which reads
Sheela Ramani vs L Shivaraju on 7 August, 2024
signed on Ex.P1 to 3. Therefore,
the changing version itself shows that to avoid the liability, he
was take false defence.
33. Therefore
Sheela Ramani vs L Shivaraju on 7 August, 2024
signed on Ex.P1 to 3. Therefore,
the changing version itself shows that to avoid the liability, he
was take false defence.
33. Therefore
M Sheela Ramani vs L Shivaraju on 7 August, 2024
signed on Ex.P1 to 3.
Therefore, the changing version itself shows that to avoid the
liability, he was take false defence.
33. Therefore
M/S.Nouveau Labs Private Limited vs M/S.Meritsind Technologies Private on 13 February, 2023
accused
account or not. Therefore after going through such changed
versions of the PW.1 it reveals that PW.1 he himself
In This Case Has Testified In Her ... vs No.1 In The Year 2011 Alleging Creation ... on 11 January, 2023
that she
enquired only about her signature and again she has
changed her version by stating that she has not
enquired with anybody about ... they have not tried to change
khata of disputed property. He has again changed his
version saying that till 2001 they tried to change
khata
The State Of Karnataka vs Ajith Kumar @ Ajith on 19 December, 2019
creates doubt
about the case of prosecution, since she has changed version in
her chief examination, treating her as hostile and cross-
examination
Sri Raja vs Mr.Narayanaswamy on 15 February, 2016
rider was not covered
in the policy of scooter, she has changed version and stated that
the accident has occurred due to negligence