legs to stand
against the applicant as the prosecutrix herself is
changing her version. He submitted that prior to
registration ... show
presence of the applicant. He submitted that considering
the change of version in several statements of the
prosecutrix recorded during the course of investigation
recorded as
was stated by him, but in next breathe, he changed his version and
deposed that he had not given any statement ... counting currency notes, but in next breathe he again changed his
version and deposed that when he entered into chamber, then
present police officials were
Assessee's changed version is clearly an
af t e r t h o u g h t a n d is only
Evidence Act . If witnesses are changing version in Court
and different version was given before police, it is always
open to the defence to bring
Vijay Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 26 May, 2017
Author: Ajai Lamba
Bench
presence at
the spot cannot be doubted. Jaswinder Singh has been changing his
version with regard to the assailants from time to time. The first
recorded by the Trial Court. Trial Court observed that he was
changing his version on each questions being put by the learned ... Learned Additional Sessions Judge has
recorded an observation that he was changing his versions with each
question being put by the learned defence counsel
applicant ever moved any complaint
to any authority. The repeatedly changing version of the
applicant suggests that there is no end of litigation based upon
However, on 01.03.2010, she sufferred another disclosure
statement Ex.PO and changed the version with regard to disclosure of
abovesaid articles. This time she disclosed ... Village Bhatgaon, but in her second statement recorded on
01.03.2010, she changed her version and disclosed the fact that infact those
articles had been kept
contradiction in the FIR their allegations cannot be
accepted. They have changed their version only to implicate ... 2001
appellants with appellant Rajesh and, therefore, their changed
version cannot be accepted. But the witnesses have proved that it
was the appellant Rajesh
