summoning them for the purpose of further cross examination,
they totally changed their version. Therefore, the trial Court
has rightly convicted the appellant. There ... accused.
Subsequently on 26.10.2017, once again this witness totally
changed her version and supported the accused and in the
cross examination, she has admitted that
consideration by the
Tribunal while preferring to rely upon the changed version
of P.W.4. The other contention of the Insurance Company
that
evidence that he has signed Ex. P-2 but he changed his version only to the effect that Chinnappa had obtained his signature ... that ground he was cross-examined. Immediately he has changed his version to the effect that Ex. P-2 (b) is not his signature
Though defendants 1
to 3 contested the suit, later they changed their version. For a
period of six years, plaintiff kept quite. The sale ... 1994 denying the agreement to sell and
subsequently changed their version and filed their amended
written statement. They have admitted the execution of the
agreement
instead of accused No.2 and
later he has changed his version and stated that the
police told him to identify accused ... Court)
and thereafter, once again this witness changed the
version and identified accused Nos.3 and 6 and further
stated the accused
sale deed on the basis of
the agreement. She has changed the version stating
that accused informed that he will get the site from ... rightly appreciated the evidence of PW.2. The
complainant changes her version stating that accused
promised to get the site out of the layout formed
that, he is won-over by
accused as he went on changing his versions as per his
convenience. Even if this evidence is ignored ... evidence of PW.2 discloses that, he went on changing
his versions as per his convenience and it is evident that
However, while giving evidence before the
Court, dramatically she has changed her version claiming
that she was minor as on the date of her kidnapping ... reasons best
known, before the Court, the prosecutrix has dramatically
changed her version and claimed that the accused took her
forcibly and committed rape
senior counsel for the petitioners
submits that the prosecuting agency has changed its version
and in the complaint instituted, though there is reference of
four ... investigation and the explanation
7
offered by the prosecution in changing its version is not
acceptable in law. Therefore he claims that
senior counsel for the petitioners
submits that the prosecuting agency has changed its version
and in the complaint instituted, though there is reference of
four ... investigation and the explanation
7
offered by the prosecution in changing its version is not
acceptable in law. Therefore he claims that
