statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. she changed her version and allegation of rape was assigned to the co-accused Akhlaq ... statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. she changed her version the role of the applicant was assigned only helping the co-accused Akhlaq
victim has given a changed version wherein she has stated that while the applicant Sonu apprehended and lay on her, co-accused Salman recorded
statement recorded on
21.2.2023, injured/ complainant has again changed his version and stated that
Nikhil and Harshul Gupta had caught hold his hand ... released on anticipatory bail by the trial Court
itself. Considering the changing version of the injured / complainant about
different persons causing injury by knife
withdrawal of the said matter
and/or for change of her version. It is, thus, alleged that the Appellants, in
order to get an undue ... prosecutrix for
withdrawal of her case and/or for change of her version. It is contended
further that based upon the alleged incident so happened
witness account version, applicant is made accused on the basis of second version. Both the eye witness account version changed the manner of assault
case
would be evident from the fact that victim has been changing
versions of the occurrence inasmuch as in her statement under
Section
initially the
complainant named Tarun Dhingra in the FIR and later changed his version
alleging that Harinder Dhingra (petitioner herein) was involved in the
occurrence ... Learned counsel submits that this change of version shows that
the entire case is totally false and FIR deserves to be quashed on this
ground
going through evidence of PW1 and PW7,
entire case of prosecution version changes to the effect
that PW1 was assaulted by means
itself and it is only thereafter that the complainant entirely
changed his version at the instance of his brother Tej Pal and
gave an entirely ... Hence, it is manifest on record that the complainant
has entirely changed his version in his statements recorded before
the police. Though in the initial
followed by two other
accused. But in his cross-examination, CW1 changed his version
and testified that a fight had taken place between ... material facts of the case.
22. CW1 and CW2 also kept changing their versions as
regards prior dealings between the complainant and accused
