appellant were seized and he signed on the panchnama. He changed his
version and stated that the police did not seize and seal the blood ... hole of the door does not
inspire confidence. He has changed his version frequently. At one stage,
he says that when he went to bring
Learned
Counsel for the petitioner submitted that in spite of changed version regarding
theft of vehicle and leaving ignition key in the vehicle ... were negligent in leaving the key
in the vehicle and changing their version and not coming with clean hands
before District Forum and impugned order
approximately after four weeks of the
incident. When the prosecutrix changed her version from
her previous statement to her subsequent statement then,
there ... recorded her correct statement and secondly, that she
wanted to change her version drastically. In the present
case, it was not the allegation
circumstance, under which,
the so called document was allegedly executed. Merely changing
the version from 'on' to 'from' and the date ... from 10.08.2007 to
20.09.2007 cannot by itself change the version and lend
16
credence to the claim, which is apparently contrary to the
contents
learned Magistrate in statement under section 164 CrPC all together changed version of the incident. The witnesses of prosecution further changed the prosecution version ... after 8 days of the incident, the prosecutrix changed the version before the Magistrate under Section 164 Cr.P.C.. PW 1 categorically stated that
namely, Jagan had not
been to the marriage ceremony; but then changed his version by
saying that he does not know. He stated
there was blood in his hand. However, this witness has changed his version in examination-in chief and stated in the very next sentence that ... hands. After making the said statement this witness has changed his version and stated that Ravindra Kumar Verma was lying inside the room
Appellant.
However, in his cross-examination PW-7 gave a changed version and
stated:
"When we reached near the tea vendors stall the Complainant
first dying declaration and has put up a totally
changed version of the facts about the same incident dated 29.2.2004. The
Exhibit 80 which
namely, Jagan had not
been to the marriage ceremony; but then changed his version by
saying that he does not know. He stated
