defendant is proposed to change their label and if the defendant
continue to use the label in changed version, the plaintiff has no objection ... injunctions, would go to show that the label was in changed version and
that the defendant is continuing the using of changed label version
said offending mark, but introduced another mark. That mark had some changes in design in the lower half of the rounded and that was replaced ... four leaves and some other modifications wete made. Inasmuch as that changed version was an infringement of the plaintiff's trade mark, according
written at the house of Ramachandran, but immediately
he changed his version and told that Ex.B.1 was written at the house of scribe ... things for the execution of Ex.B.1. But immediately he changed his
version and stated that Ramachandran did not know anything about
Pankajam Parthasarathy And Five Others vs Kasturi Guna Singh on 27 September, 2000
ORDER
1
entrustment mahazar Ex.P6. In the said circumstances, he only changed
his version relating to the demand of Rs.500/- and he deposed that ... view of the above discussion it is clear that the appellant changed his
version in order to help the accused. In similar circumstance
injuries while the deceased was lying face downwards, the witnesses now changed their version and said that the first accused stabbed the deceased while ... size, P.W. 2 has now changed the version in Court and would state that she sustained the injury due to stab with knife
sharp edged portion of aruval. However, later on, they have changed
their version and they have stated that the second accused attacked D-2 with ... with the medical evidence, the prosecution has
managed to change the version and that is how, PW-1 and PW-2 have stated, in
their
witnesses when
examined before the Court have all clearly given a different version that it was
accused No.4 who joined with accused ... weapon or was attributed with any over
act and therefore this changed version of the witnesses before the court would
indicate that all these witnesses
cogent and during chief
examination she stated something and changed her version during the
cross examination the victim herself stated that nobody kidnapped ... something about
the occurrence but in the cross examination she totally changed her version
9/21
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
cogent and during chief
examination she stated something and changed her version during the
cross examination the victim herself stated that nobody kidnapped ... something about
the occurrence but in the cross examination she totally changed her version
9/21
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
