Scheduled appearance of
the witnesses in the trial Court, she had changed her version, disowned the
statement made before the Hon'ble Supreme Court ... Serious questions arise as to the role played by witnesses who
changed their versions more frequently than chameleons.
Zahira's role in the whole
Complainant, while appearing as a witness before the Trial Court; has
changed his version of allegations. While in the FIR it has been alleged ... petitioners is not even factually correct in
submitting that Complainant has changed his version of allegations while
appearing as witness before the Trial Court
over by the accused and that is why I have changed my version so as to help the accused. It is incorrect to suggest that ... over by the accused and that is why I have changed my version so as to help the accused party. It is incorrect to suggest
presence at
the spot cannot be doubted. Jaswinder Singh has been changing his
version with regard to the assailants from time to time. The first
keeping in view the fact that the said statement is a
changed version after a period of 09 months. On the day of occurrence ... Gurnishan Singh is recorded on
19.03.2016 which is a changed version after 09 months and the
apprehensions of the appellants that their relatives threatened them
falsely implicate the appellant-accused.
Even otherwise both the witnesses changed their version when they
9 of 28
::: Downloaded ... Ramesh PW-2 as referred above clearly indicate that they had
changed their version with the passage of time. Therefore, their
statements cannot be safely
registered.
7. As is evident from the aforesaid version of the FIR, there is
no allegation against the petitioner to have used any casteist remarks ... made
by the complainant on 17.09.2019 and 27.09.2019, wherein complainant
gave changed version of the incident, but even therein, there is absolutely
no allegation
learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Kaithal, in which
she had entirely changed her version. She stated that on 25.07.2017 at about ... accused of committing rape with her.
Still further, she changed her version at every stage and her three statements
are on record, which were made
applicant ever moved any complaint
to any authority. The repeatedly changing version of the
applicant suggests that there is no end of litigation based upon
head
of his father but on the next day he had changed his version and stated that
Jage Ram had been given the lathi injury ... supplementary statement of
the complainant was recorded wherein he changed his version stating that it
was Jage Ram who had given the injury
