prosecution witness is to be accepted and if he changes version later on,
the evidence cannot be discarded as there remains a likelihood ... counsel has argued that Rasia is an interested
witness and his changing version several times makes him an unreliable
witness on the two accounts
that Mukesh also dealt knife blow
upon him, but immediately, he changed his version by saying that
except appellant no.4 Raghuveer, all the accused ... third appellant Mukesh were armed with
danda (lathi). But by changing her version she has deposed in
12 Cr.A. No. 1536/00
para
Laxman appeared in the witness-
box as NAW-1, he totally changed the version which was
submitted by him to the police ... gone to the field with his tractor and thresher
and changed the version that thresher was already available with
Ganesh Ram and also gave
when the prosecution witnesses appeared in the court, they completely changed their original version given to the police. Learned counsel referred to the statement ... Learned counsel further submitted that Samay Singh (PW6) also changed his version and gave different version in the court than the one given
when the prosecution witnesses appeared in the court, they completely changed their original version given to the police. Learned counsel referred to the statement ... Learned counsel further submitted that Samay Singh (PW6) also changed his version and gave different version in the court than the one given
after a lapse of three months, then he
completely took changed version by deposing that
statement made before ld. MM or before the Court
life while Suresh lost his vision of left eye. The cross-version that Vaibhav Singh had fired upon Suresh, is still being investigated ... another guard who was none else but Suresh. There is completely changed version in the statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., according
complainant to having recognized the alleged assailants, has
changed his version to state that they were sitting on the
"Katta" near Maremma Temple ... identify the
assailants at that time of the incident. This changed version
throwing grave doubt of the very occurrence of the incident, has
been lightly
trial
court has noted that Patram was 'compelled to change his
version a little' because of doctor's opinion after the
postmortem ... case where one of the material witnesses
chose to change his version to suit a particular theory projected by
the prosecution
date of alleged
trap. From time to time prosecution went on changing its versions
7
and improving the case, important witnesses are not examined ... record specifies that from stage to stage the prosecution
went on changing its versions and there is no consistency. In
addition to this inconsistency, there
