prosecution witness is to be accepted and if he changes version later on,
the evidence cannot be discarded as there remains a likelihood ... counsel has argued that Rasia is an interested
witness and his changing version several times makes him an unreliable
witness on the two accounts
Medical Officer. At the Trial all the three witnesses
changed their version by stating that only A-1, Suba Singh
climbed on the wall with ... explanation, with the result
that their credibility was sufficiently impeached. The
change of version by each one of them, and to the same
effect
Singh to show his pocket. At that stage, Jai Singh changed his version and told the deceased that the amount in question had fallen ... Singh to show him the pocket. At that stage, Jai Singh changed his version and told tlie deceased that the money had fallen from
attendants as a fall from some height but later on they changed their version by saying that the victim was beaten by rods and stones ... pertinent to note that this again was a changed version in as much as in the first instance the doctor was told that the deceased
cross-examination by
APP with the permission of the Court, he changed his version and stated
that it was recovered at the instance ... unchallenged in the cross. In response to which question, PW-2 changed
his version is not understandable because he was not confronted with his
earlier
there, thereafter the witness went to lodge the report.
This witness changed his version in Court by saying that
he not only saw the accused ... also not reliable as he was
younger brother of deceased and changed his version. As
per first version, he stated that he saw appellant Ramesh
appellant Ghambir. The evidence given by this witness
is contradictory to the version mentioned in the FIR Ex.P-2
and his case diary statement ... witness materially
changes his testimony from the FIR, then that change
should be considered as an after thought and changed
version cannot be accepted
namely, Jagan had not
been to the marriage ceremony; but then changed his version by
saying that he does not know. He stated
Yamin
(PW-3) was initially not cross-examined. PW-3‟s version did change after
about eight months on 26th May, 2009 when ... attention was
drawn to the fact that the said witness had changed his version about the
presence of the relatives of Rehana when
during cross-examination on behalf of accused Satbir Singh he had changed his version by claiming that five persons had come to their house ... only on that day that PW-10 changed his version and claimed that all the five accused were involved in the incident
