Shiv Bahadur vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. ... on 4 April, 2023
However Section 376 IPC is inserted later on. Thus, the changed version between the contents of FIR as well as statement under Section
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 96 (1.58 seconds)Abhishek Pratap Singh @ Chunnu vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. on 26 July, 2023
changed in the statement of the complainant recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. As per the statement of complainantin the changed version, the applicant
Ram Chandra S/O Ram Gopal vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko on 16 March, 2023
same version, however, supplementary statement was recorded in which he has changed the version and stated that five accused including the applicant had hanged ... case as well as nature of allegations made in the FIR, change of version in supplementary statement and the fact that the co-accused
Rinku vs State Of Haryana on 19 August, 2021
under Section 161 Cr.P.C. on the
same lines of the version recorded by the complainant in the FIR. However,
after a period ... police while changing the place of occurrence as well
as the details of the accused/assailants. In the changed version, the role
attributed
Sandeep vs State Of Haryana on 21 January, 2022
under Section 161 Cr.P.C. on the same lines of the
version recorded by the complainant in the FIR. In his supplementary
statement, recorded ... complainant changed the place of occurrence as well as the details of the
accused/assailants. In the changed version, the role attributed to the
petitioner
( Rep. By Sr.App) vs No.1 To 4 Are R/O No.15/25 on 2 March, 2021
stated that the accused No.3 has molested her. The
version of alleged act changed every time. C.W.1 at the
frst instance ... victims
whose evidence is stereo type and they are changing
version in frst information, before police and before the
court, it cannot be said that
State vs . Mohd Iqbal on 25 June, 2018
suddenly the complainant/PW1's version regarding the
initial number of persons allegedly involved changed inexplicably from four to two.
Also noteworthy ... brother were physically injured by Tyagi but during trial the version
changed to Iqbal and Tyagi having tried to hit her brother and stopped
Jeet Ram And Others vs Parkash Chand on 16 February, 2010
filed falsely by the complainant (Parkash Chand) against
Yad Ram by changing the version as mentioned in the statement
dated 14.11.2000 (Annexure
Jamaloo @ Jamaluddin vs State Of U.P. on 21 August, 2023
second statement was recorded by the Investigating Officer then he changed his version and stated that applicant caused injury on the head of the deceased ... applicant and post-mortem report of the deceased also corroborates the version of the witnesses including injured witnesses but both the counsels could not dispute
Jasbir Singh vs Raj Kumar And Ors on 12 March, 2015
this document
-7-
CRM-A-1651-MA-2014
been made to change the version by making
improvement and I find merit in the arguments