Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 108 (0.89 seconds)

Sanosh vs State Of Keala on 10 February, 2012

report was accordingly filed in court. The victim again changed her versions and alleged a case of actual rape when she was examined ... explanation given by the lady in cross-examination for the change in versions on two occasions is not convincing and acceptable. After two days
Kerala High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Pawan @ Rajeev on 23 May, 2012

during her cross examination has stated that prosecutrix has changed her version regarding the vehicle by which the prosecutrix was dropped near Ekta Model School ... accused near Ekta Model School by the car whereas she changed her version that she was dropped by the accused on his motorcycle. Prosecutrix
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Balmukand vs State on 12 December, 2012

apparently under the pressure of these circumstances that the prosecutrix changed her version and implicated the petitioner and Raju for the offences of abduction ... Investigating Agency in the negative FR that the prosecutrix changed her version and made a false allegation in order to implicate the petitioner
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S Mehta - Full Document

State vs Gaurav Matta on 16 November, 2012

marry her, she lodged complaint with the police. Prosecutrix kept on changing her version every now and then. In examination in chief dated ... hotel at Saharanpur. While in the examination dated 06.10.2012 she changed her version by stating that she was the consenting party and specifically admitted that
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Vijay on 25 February, 2012

cannot be relied upon at all as she changed her version in each of her statement recorded either by police or by Ld. Magistrate. Hence ... testimony it is evident that the 'P' has changed her version every time whenever gave statement. In her statement ExPW1/DB given
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Anwar Hussain on 5 March, 2012

identified by the prosecutrix. In the cross-examination, he contradicted the police version and stated that neither he nor his wife or his daughter informed ... identification of his daughter. In the cross- examination, he changed his version and stated that neither he nor his daughter were present at the time
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 9 - S P Garg - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next