prosecution witness is to be accepted and if he changes version later on,
the evidence cannot be discarded as there remains a likelihood ... counsel has argued that Rasia is an interested
witness and his changing version several times makes him an unreliable
witness on the two accounts
chief examination complainant identified the
accused, however, in cross examination complainant changed his
version and did not support the prosecution case and when
complainant ... Addl. P.P. also sought
explanation from the complainant for changing his version during
cross examination to which the complainant answered as under
Medical Officer. At the Trial all the three witnesses
changed their version by stating that only A-1, Suba Singh
climbed on the wall with ... explanation, with the result
that their credibility was sufficiently impeached. The
change of version by each one of them, and to the same
effect
that in order to implicate each member of the family she changed the version of incident. In her testimony in the Court she described ... jethani Nimal and not Om Prabha. All these improvements and changing versions have been made by her just to see that entire family is implicated
Singh to show his pocket. At that stage, Jai Singh changed his version and told the deceased that the amount in question had fallen ... Singh to show him the pocket. At that stage, Jai Singh changed his version and told tlie deceased that the money had fallen from
attendants as a fall from some height but later on they changed their version by saying that the victim was beaten by rods and stones ... pertinent to note that this again was a changed version in as much as in the first instance the doctor was told that the deceased
contended that the complainant had completely altered his version in Court viz-a-viz his initial version to the police and, therefore, his evidence ... side on his chest.
13. There is no doubt a changed version as deposed to by Prashant in Court viz-a-viz what
cross-examination by
APP with the permission of the Court, he changed his version and stated
that it was recovered at the instance ... unchallenged in the cross. In response to which question, PW-2 changed
his version is not understandable because he was not confronted with his
earlier
there, thereafter the witness went to lodge the report.
This witness changed his version in Court by saying that
he not only saw the accused ... also not reliable as he was
younger brother of deceased and changed his version. As
per first version, he stated that he saw appellant Ramesh
statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. she changed her version and allegation of rape was assigned to the co-accused Akhlaq ... statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. she changed her version the role of the applicant was assigned only helping the co-accused Akhlaq
