report was accordingly filed in
court. The victim again changed her versions and alleged a
case of actual rape when she was examined ... explanation
given by the lady in cross-examination for the change in
versions on two occasions is not convincing and acceptable.
After two days
cross-examination by
APP with the permission of the Court, he changed his version and stated
that it was recovered at the instance ... unchallenged in the cross. In response to which question, PW-2 changed
his version is not understandable because he was not confronted with his
earlier
there, thereafter the witness went to lodge the report.
This witness changed his version in Court by saying that
he not only saw the accused ... also not reliable as he was
younger brother of deceased and changed his version. As
per first version, he stated that he saw appellant Ramesh
marked, by the Court. Thereafter, the
1st respondent changed his advocate, and on his advise, he wanted to withdraw
the affidavit filed earlier and substitute ... petitioner opposed the application. Obviously because the changed version of the
1st respondent was supporting his case, the 2nd respondent did not oppose the
application
appellant Ghambir. The evidence given by this witness
is contradictory to the version mentioned in the FIR Ex.P-2
and his case diary statement ... witness materially
changes his testimony from the FIR, then that change
should be considered as an after thought and changed
version cannot be accepted
oscillates from Dan to Beersheba. He took diverse and conflicting stands. His version, as it appears in the FIR is reproduced as under.
He submitted ... Police to take action against the culprits.
11. However,
this version changes when the complaint
was filed. Para No.4 of the complaint is
reproduced
that why appellant caught hold of her hand, but,
thereafter, after changing her version she states that in order to
outrage her modesty, the appellant ... grip of her father-in-law. In cross-examination by
changing her version the prosecutrix is saying that appellant caught
CRA No.2201/1999
during her cross examination has stated that prosecutrix
has changed her version regarding the vehicle by which the
prosecutrix was dropped near Ekta Model School ... accused near
Ekta Model School by the car whereas she changed her version
that she was dropped by the accused on his motorcycle.
Prosecutrix
also went by that
car. But, during cross-examination, he had changed his version.
He stated that on knowing that Sajeevan was taken to hospital ... during
[Crl.A.78/2008] 26
cross-examination, he had changed his version. He stated that
when PW4 went to take his car, Sajeevan
Though defendants 1
to 3 contested the suit, later they changed their version. For a
period of six years, plaintiff kept quite. The sale ... 1994 denying the agreement to sell and
subsequently changed their version and filed their amended
written statement. They have admitted the execution of the
agreement
