Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 493 (0.83 seconds)

Sunil Bharti Mittal vs Cbi on 9 January, 2015

framing charges. As the appellant was implicated involving the principle of vicarious liability, which is not applicable and erroneously referred to, he had no option ... expanded those submissions. Emphasising that position in law with regard to vicarious liability was that there is no such vicarious liability in criminal law unless
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 797 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Vinubhai Ranchhodbhai Patel vs Rajivbhai Dudabhai Patel . on 16 May, 2018

appreciation of evidence in the context of the question of vicarious liability is wholly unsubstantial and not in accordance with the settled principles ... does not   create   a   separate   offence   but   only   declares   the   vicarious liability  of   all the  members of an unlawful assembly  in certain circumstances
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 45 - J Chelameswar - Full Document

Bijoy Kumar Moni vs Paresh Manna on 20 December, 2024

absence of compliance with the requirements necessary for the applicability of vicarious liability as provided under Section 141 , the accused could not have been convicted ... vicariously liable for the offence alleged to have been committed by the company, then in the absence of company being prosecuted, no vicarious liability
Supreme Court of India Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bharat Mittal vs State Of Rajasthan on 18 December, 2025

case namely, the liquidation of the company, the wrongful imposition of vicarious liability, partial recovery already effected, and his financial incapacity, the appellant prayed ... held vicariously liable under Section 141 merely on account of his designation. This Court answered the question in the negative, holding that vicarious liability under
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next