absence of compliance
with the requirements necessary for the applicability of vicarious liability
as provided under Section 141 , the accused could not have been convicted ... vicariously liable for the offence alleged to have been committed by the
company, then in the absence of company being prosecuted, no vicarious
liability
trust.
x. It was further contended that there was no vicarious liability for the
petitioner no. 2 to 6 as the concept of vicarious liability ... longer res integra that unless a statute specifically
provides for vicarious liability, the said liability could not be read into a
penal provision
only be brought
in the dragnet on the touchstone of vicarious liability as the
same has been stipulated in the provision itself ... cardinal
principle of criminal jurisprudence that there is no
vicarious liability unless the Statute specifically
provides for. It is further held by this Court
even the Director. There are no
allegations to constitute the vicarious liability. In Maksud
Saiyed v. State of Gujarat [Maksud Saiyed v. State of
Gujarat ... that the Penal Code does not
contain any provision for attaching vicarious liability on the
part of the Managing Director or the Directors
even the Director. There are no
allegations to constitute the vicarious liability. In Maksud
Saiyed v. State of Gujarat [Maksud Saiyed v. State of
Gujarat ... that the Penal Code does not
contain any provision for attaching vicarious liability on the
part of the Managing Director or the Directors
only be brought in the drag-net on the touchstone of
vicarious liability as the same has been stipulated in the
provision itself
conduct of business of BTIL and thus
vicarious liability cannot be fastened upon them to bring them under the
rigours of Section ... liable for commission
of such an offence would be vicariously liable therefor. Such vicarious
liability can be inferred so far as a company registered
only be brought in the drag-net on the touchstone of
vicarious liability as the same has been stipulated in the
provision itself
conduct of business of BTIL and thus
vicarious liability cannot be fastened upon them to bring them under the
rigours of Section ... liable for commission
of such an offence would be vicariously liable therefor. Such vicarious
liability can be inferred so far as a company registered
conduct of business of BTIL and thus
vicarious liability cannot be fastened upon them to bring them under the
rigours of Section ... liable for commission
of such an offence would be vicariously liable therefor. Such vicarious
liability can be inferred so far as a company registered
