seconds video clip. One fails
to understand that while the videography was going at the spot, why
videography of only 35 seconds when Mudassir ... injured was captured
and it did not have any videography prior thereto or thereafter, for the reason
the same would have captured all the people
found when they reached
there. Pant and shirt was hanging. No videography was done. In crossÂ
examination on behalf of accused Ashu Sharma stated that ... house of Ashu Sharma. No neighbour joined the
investigation. No videography or photography conducted at the time of recovery
from the house of Ashu Sharma
business hours, and as such, the very
evidence regarding photography and videography becomes
doubtful.
8. The learned Senior Counsel for the appellant further
submitted that ... further stated that he has
also made the videography of the entire procedure.
35. It will also be relevant to refer to the following
observations
suffice to mention here that those CCTV footages are not the
videography of entire incident but they are footages of CCTV cameras
installed at different
scene of
crime. He has stated that identification of an accused in videography was a
Herculean task, and therefore, if an accused has been identified
locked in a
room attached to the office. He made a videography of the aforesaid
assault. On 9.3.2020 near about at 1.30 in the night
scene of
crime. He has stated that identification of an accused in videography was a
Herculean task, and therefore, if an accused has been identified
urged that due care be taken in
taking the photographs and recording videography inasmuch as the
requirement of the Court while trying the matter shall
bone parts of the
deceased were recovered which was captured by videography.
Those bone parts were collected and sealed in presence of the
Executive Magistrate
scene of
crime. He has stated that identification of an accused in videography was a
Herculean task, and therefore, if an accused has been identified
