Aminpur Investigation
Centre, seized compact discs prepared by P.W. 35 regarding videography of
confession of Provash Dhali.
P.W. 21, Sikha Naskar ... prepared CDs and photographs from
memory card produced by I.O. regarding videography made by him at the
place of occurrence.
P.W. 35, Indrajit
Aminpur Investigation
Centre, seized compact discs prepared by P.W. 35 regarding videography of
confession of Provash Dhali.
P.W. 21, Sikha Naskar ... prepared CDs and photographs from
memory card produced by I.O. regarding videography made by him at the
place of occurrence.
P.W. 35, Indrajit
crime scene were
taken by the crime team photographer and videography of the
scene of occurrence was also got done. Scene of crime was
State ... lifted chance prints from the spot; that
Ct.Om Parkash carried out videography of the spot; that the
State vs. Shahabuddin
Ahmed PW17 were present. The said witness has deposed having done the
videography of proceedings at the house of appellant Shama Parveen vide
videotape ... believable as in his cross-examination, he has stated that
videography of aforesaid proceedings was done in the morning at about
Ahmed PW17 were present. The said witness has deposed having done the
videography of proceedings at the house of appellant Shama Parveen vide
videotape ... believable as in his cross-examination, he has stated that
videography of aforesaid proceedings was done in the morning at about
examination.
The post-mortem examination was carried out by the medical board.
Videography was also carried out by EASI Phool Kumar. After post-mortem
examination ... also undertook videography at the time of post-mortem examination of
the body of Anita. He proved CD of the videography vide
called. Only a
private photographer was called to make the videography. There is no
certificate that the videography done by him was not tampered with ... deceased. He also said that the private photographer conducted the
photography and videography of the exhumation proceedings.
13. SI Om Prakash PW-20 a Police
entitled to bail, pending
trial, following factors weighed with it:
(a) Videography of the postmortem was not done.
(b) After the alleged accident, respondent ... time, none of these persons raised
any objection with regard to the videography of the postmortem
not being done. They did not demand second postmortem
scene of
crime. He has stated that identification of an accused in videography was a
Herculean task, and therefore, if an accused has been identified
also present at the spot stated that the videography was taken.
Although in his examination-in-chief, he stated that on the pointing