Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1171 (1.45 seconds)

Manjit Singh vs Central Vigilance Commission on 11 May, 2017

Manjit Singh vs Central Vigilance Commission on 11 May, 2017 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Decision ... Apartments, Sector-43, Gurgaon, Haryana-122009. Respondent : Central Public Information Officer, Central Vigilance Commission, Satarkta Bhawan, G.P.O. Complex, Block-A, INA, New Delhi
Central Information Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Saidur Rehman vs Ministry Of Railways on 5 October, 2017

Saidur Rahman ...Appellant Vs Ravinder Pandey, CPIO - 188 & Joint Director / Vigilance (A&P), Min of Railway, Railway Board, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi ... Floor, Railway Board, New Delhi-110001 & The Chief Vigilance Officer, Vigilance Department, Northern Railway, Headquarters Office, Baroda House, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi
Central Information Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harish Kumar vs Mcd on 17 May, 2017

instances of unauthorized construction in S.P. Zone, copies of Dak registers, Vigilance Dak register & police complaint register etc on 7 points. The CPIO ... 2015/001899, the appellant sought copy of letter issued by Vigilance Department relating to non initiation of action against 477 nos. of unauthorized properties within
Central Information Commission Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sharbati Devi vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi, Govt. ... on 21 November, 2017

Centre, J.L.N.Marg, New Delhi. 2. The Additional Commissioner (DEMS), Vigilance Department, South Delhi Municipal Corporation, Dr.Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Civic Centre ... Shri Hem Raj Singh, Process Server, Tourism Department, GNCTD, addressed to Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) regarding withdrawal of HRA by the Charged Official Smt. Sarbati
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K A Muhammed Faizel vs M/O Home Affairs on 26 September, 2017

Muhammed Faizel, aged 55 years, S/o. Ammu Sahib, Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Central Range, Ernakulam, Kochi - 682 017, residing ... Kannur - 670 001. 10. V.N. Sasidharan, Superintendent of Police (Non IPS), Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau, Special Cell, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. 11. Mohammed Iqbal
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

Priyesh Bheda vs M/O Finance on 27 October, 2017

after laying down the law with respect to clearance from Vigilance Angle. (c) Direct the respondents to produce all the records of the case along ... various Government departments. However, it was not considered for want of vigilance clearance. The Applicant also took recourse to the provisions of RTI Act during
Central Administrative Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K A Muhammed Faizel vs M/O Home Affairs on 26 September, 2017

Muhammed Faizel, aged 55 years, S/o. Ammu Sahib, Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Central Range, Ernakulam, Kochi - 682 017, residing ... Kannur - 670 001. 10. V.N. Sasidharan, Superintendent of Police (Non IPS), Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau, Special Cell, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. 11. Mohammed Iqbal
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document

T Gopalakrishna Pillai vs M/O Home Affairs on 26 September, 2017

Muhammed Faizel, aged 55 years, S/o. Ammu Sahib, Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Central Range, Ernakulam, Kochi - 682 017, residing ... Kannur - 670 001. 10. V.N. Sasidharan, Superintendent of Police (Non IPS), Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau, Special Cell, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. 11. Mohammed Iqbal
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next