Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2785 (1.33 seconds)

Mukesh Sisodia vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 3 February, 2026

applicant was under suspension and hence vigilance clearance may be withheld. Since vigilance clearance was withheld, the promotion order issued by BSNL Corporate Office could ... vigilance clearance. Accordingly, vigilance clearance was sought on 26.05.2018. However, the Vigilance Cell, BSNL, vide impugned letter dated 04.08.2018 (Annexure A-10), withheld the vigilance
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Oleena C S vs M/O Mines on 3 March, 2023

issuing offer of promotion, vigilance clearance was obtained from Adm.Vigilance Section, CHQ, as per rule. In the said vigilance clearance, it was mentioned that ... three conditions for denial of vigilance clearance brought out earlier, states that "withholding of vigilance clearance to a government servant who is not under
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mes-461913 vs Union Of India Through The Secretary on 20 April, 2011

under:- Official respondents counsel states that due to withholding of vigilance clearance, promotion of the applicant had been placed under sealed cover and on implication ... fair and equitable consideration for promotion. As there is nothing adverse against the applicant, unnecessarily withholding the vigilance clearance of the applicant, as no material
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Praveen Jain vs Union Of India Through on 10 August, 2015

Good only. As a consequence, while the applicant was declared `Unfit for promotion, three of his juniors were promoted to the rank of Chief Commissioner ... numerical grading of `9/10. The applicant had already been accorded vigilance clearance certificate and on the date of the original DPC dated
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next