concerned
department of the MHA for the information sought is the VIP Security
Unit. The respondent submits that the first appellate authority in respect ... VIP, Security Unit did not get an opportunity to examine the
contentions of the applicant.
6. Furthermore, with regards to the information, the respondent submits
Delhi ...प्रततिादी/Respondent
PIO/M/o Home Affairs (IS-1) Division, VIP
Security Unit Room No.08, 2ndFloor MDC
National Stadium, New Delhi
PIO/ Ministry ... reproduced verbatim]
Sh. Rajendra Chaturvedi-PIO/US, MHA (IS-I Division), VIP Security Unit vide
letter dated 04.07.2018 replied to the Appellant stating that responsibility
National Stadium, New Delhi - 110001
The CPIO,
IS-I Division, VIP Security,
Ministry of Home Affairs, MDC National
Stadium, New Delhi - 110001
Page ... category
5. X category
The CPIO, MHA, IS-I Div., VIP Security Unit vide letter dated 05.09.2018
furnished a reply to the Appellant inter alia
Krishna Swarnakar - Dir.
PIO, Ministry of Home Affairs(IS-I Division)
VIP Security Unit, Room No. 08, 2nd Floor,
MDC National Stadium, New Delhi ... literature, banned material, prohibited material etc.
The CPIO, IS-I Division, VIP Security Unit vide letter dated 27.09.2018 replied as
under:-
Dissatisfied with the response
categories of VIP Security.
2. List of persons covered by different types of security-cover.
3. Total number of persons enjoying VIP security-cover ... different type of Security cover, total number of persons
enjoying security cover, approximate cost incurred on each type of security covers
may not be feasible
representation dated 08.06.2016 was
forwarded to the concerned authorities viz. the VIP Security Division, Ministry of
Home Affairs, State Government of Uttar Pradesh ... Secretary (Home), Government of UP, Lucknow
and Under Secretary (VIP Security), MHA, New Delhi. The complainant was also
advised to obtain further information from
deployment of
officials for various duties, including VIP duties, disclosure of which could cause
breach of security and hence, the information was denied.
Decision
After ... stated that disclosure of
information about posting of police officials on VIP security was denied
Chandigarh. Wherein, some part of Point No. 3 relates
with VIP Security Wing the appellant had sought the information "पुलिस अफसरों को
दिये गये
office of PIO (Security Unit), DCP, HQ, New Delhi for further query in this regard. The PIO
cum DCP (Security) (HQ), vide its letter dated ... this information could not be disclosed being sensitive relating
to the VIP security. The reply had been received by the Appellant. The Respondent (Vice
President
points regarding Zplus Security
category, including (i) who are the persons eligible for this category of security along with their
designation and addresses ... present despite notice. The respondent
Shri R. Chaturvedi, Deputy Secretary, VIP Security, MHA was present in person.
4. The respondent submitted that the information which
