Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

present writ petition on the ground that he is a visually blind person, and respondent 2 to 4 filed the suit against

that they were of the opinion that the benefit extended to the blind persons in pursuance of Government order No.147-SW of 2014 dated ... Government Order No.147-SW dated 17.06.2014 shall not include blindness/visually impaired persons. 22. Respondent no.2, i.e., the Commission, in their reply

Saurabh Mohunta, D.A.G., Haryana. *** ARUN MONGA, J. Petitioner, blind/visually impaired to the extent of 100%, is before this court, in what ... petitioner would vehemently argue that the petitioner being a 100% visually impaired person and working as Tabla Player for the last more than 30 years

read with reservation under disability that he is suffering from 100% blindness (visuality). The Respondent- selecting authority have not considered the petitioner's candidature ... petitioner's claim is under OBC category read with 100% visuality (blindness). It is also not disputed that petitioner has secured 63% marks whereas

persons suitable for this job is partially blind/partially deaf /orthopedically handicapped. Therefore, 100% blindness of visually handicapped persons are not eligible for the above ... Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department cannot be handled by 100% blindness of visually impaired persons.'' 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner

persons suitable for this job is partially blind/partially deaf /orthopedically handicapped. Therefore, 100% blindness of visually handicapped persons are not eligible for the above ... Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department cannot be handled by 100% blindness of visually impaired persons.'' 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner

Education Teachers in Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disability, Learning Disability, Deaf-Blind, Visual Impairment, Hearing Impairment and Cerebral Palsy which are RCI approved Teacher Training ... Palsy, visual impairment and hearing impairment, 1 : 5 for children with intellectual disability, ASD and Specific learning disabilities; and 1 : 2 for Deaf- Blind

suit property. She claimed that the defendant No.1 was visually blind and had executed a sale deed dated 16.5.2003 in favour of defendant

sight over a period of time and he is visually blind. 3. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule

Visually Handicapped i.e., for low vision and nnot for 100% blind. Visually Handicapped candidates who were having 100% visual disability were not selected ... subsequent notifications wherein certain posts were also identified for blind category (100% blind) under Visually Handicapped quota. 5. Amicus Curiae, Dr.S.Iqbal Ahamed