order directing the accused to permit recording of his voice for voice
sample test. Counsel submitted that a Magistrate has no inherent powers
and, therefore ... obtaining the appellant’s hair sample. He refused to give hair sample. It
was argued that hair sample can be taken under the provisions
order, an application moved on behalf of the CBI to take voice samples of the petitioners was allowed.
2. Briefly stated, the case is that ... Bisht. When the investigating officer requested the petitioners to give their voice samples for the purposes of comparison with the tape recorded conversation, the petitioners
obtaining the appellant's hair sample. He refused
to give hair sample. It was argued that hair sample can be taken under the
provisions ... looking at this issue. Voice prints are like
finger prints. Each person has a distinctive voice with characteristic
features. Voice print experts have to compare
Dhoom Singh and the
appellant – Ritesh Sinha. They, therefore, needed the voice
sample of the appellant and accordingly filed an application
before the learned jurisdictional ... praying for summoning the appellant to the
Court for recording his voice sample.
3. The learned CJM, Saharanpur by order dated 8th
January, 2010 issued
court to seek the
consent of the Appellants for obtaining their voice samples at the Central
Forensic Science Laboratory, CBI (CFSL-CBI) for the purpose ... application the Appellants furnished their consent
for tendering their voice samples. Consequently, on 13 December 2012 the
Metropolitan Magistrate disposed of the application by directing
Evidence Act
before the learned Trial Court seeking directions to record voice sample of the
prosecutrix and to send the same to CFSL for identification ... accused Vinod Kumar. He, thus, sought directions to
record the voice sample of prosecutrix and to send the same for scientific
identification. This application
Mr. Virendra Khanna vs State Of Karnataka By: on 12 March, 2021
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
prepared in his absence. Accused was not present
when his voice sample was taken. He was not present when the voice
sample of the accused ... Accused was
not present when sample of voice was taken. He was not present
when the voice sample of accused was taken. When he entered
permitting the
investigating agency to take the voice sample of the appellant for
the purpose of comparing his voice with the voice in a video ... settled, the accused should be directed to provide
the voice sample. The sample voice need be sent for evaluation to
an expert only after
respondent/SPE Lokayukta.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Law laid down:- Court can allow to take voice sample from the accused.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Significant Paragraphs:- 10, 12, 14, 15 & 17.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDER ... 2016, whereby
the Special Court directed the applicant to give his voice sample to the
Lokayukta Police.
2. It was alleged that the applicant
