order, an application moved on behalf of the CBI to take voice samples of the petitioners was allowed.
2. Briefly stated, the case is that ... Bisht. When the investigating officer requested the petitioners to give their voice samples for the purposes of comparison with the tape recorded conversation, the petitioners
Evidence Act
before the learned Trial Court seeking directions to record voice sample of the
prosecutrix and to send the same to CFSL for identification ... accused Vinod Kumar. He, thus, sought directions to
record the voice sample of prosecutrix and to send the same for scientific
identification. This application
regarding matching of
the voice samples of A-3 on the taped conversations with the sample
voice was „doubtful‟ and has not been proved ... collection of voice sample of A-3 and PW-28, Dr. Rajender Singh, CFSL
expert confirmed that the sample voice and the voice in interceptions
Singh, the Additional
SHO of PS Ashok Vihar, to record the voice samples of A-1 and A-2. This
was done in the presence ... cassette marked S-1 is stated to be the voice sample of A-2 and that marked
S-2, the voice sample
before the Metropolitan Magistrate seeking permission to collect voice
samples of the three accused for the purpose of comparison with the
recording of the voices ... from PW-29, head constable Omender Kumar (PW-25)
collected the voice samples of A-1 Bhajan Singh,A-2 Joginder and A-3
Ashok
learned Special Court had directed the petitioner to give
his voice sample for getting it matched with the intercepted call recordings
available with the prosecution ... petitioner without the Central Forensic
Science Laboratory (CFSL) report of the voice samples and no extension of
time was sought by the prosecution for completion
from the
questioned text‟ so that the petitioners may give their voice samples.
2. Since both the petitions have arisen ... samples voluntarily,
however, they cannot govern what statement is to be read by them for
such a sample. The requirement and sufficiency of a voice
regarding matching of
the voice samples of A-3 on the taped conversations with the sample
voice was „doubtful‟ and has not been proved ... collection of voice sample of A-3 and PW-28, Dr. Rajender Singh, CFSL
expert confirmed that the sample voice and the voice in interceptions
containing 182 audio files was sent for
comparison with the voice samples of the accused and other
suspected persons. The Central Forensic Science Laboratory ... positive report, stating that the voices in the recorded conversations
were the probable voices of the individuals whose specimen samples
had been sent for comparison
same was by doing a voice comparison,
which could have been facilitated only by taking their voice samples.
8. It was further pointed out that ... voices. As
duly noted by the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Ritesh Sinha (supra), the power
of the Magistrate to direct recording of voice samples
