Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

accused Dr. K.K. Arora. IO had admitted that the Voice Spectrographic Test in respect of voice

Singh examined the questioned voice of accused Rajender Kumar Gupta with his specimen voice by their linguistics and other spectrographic parameters and proved his report ... report Ex.PW16/A as per which on examination of chemical test, the presence of phenolphthalein and sodium carbonate was found

identification of suspect voice since he had no formal certificate, diploma, degree or other academic qualifications in the field of suspect voice examination or linguistic ... identification of words/samples as having been spoken as specimen voice or suspect voice was not part of the report, thus, the correctness

Cbi vs L.N Meena & Other on 24 May, 2014 CBI vs L.N

auditory examination of questioned voice marked exhibit Q­1(I)(A) and specimen voice of Shri Prahlad Singh, Constable no. 115/RB marked exhibit ... using auditory and voice spectrographic analysis, it is concluded that the voice marked exhibit Q­1(I)(A) is the probable voice of the person

wash of the Appellant and confirmed that all the three gave positive tests for sodium carbonate and phenolphthalein powder. 20. As regards the tape recorded ... sentences with respect to the specimen voice of the Appellant (S1) had been selected from Q3 for voice spectrographic analysis. 23. Parcel S1 was described

N. Sri Rama Reddy vs Sh. V. V. Giri In Reference To A Tape on

Nirbhay Kumar, The Then Dy. Sp Cbi vs Avm (Retd) Jaswant Singh Kumar & Anr

Cbi vs . Ravinder Kumar @ Ravi Jatav Etc. Page ... on 22 February, 2014 :: 1 :: IN THE

Cbi vs Awadhesh Kumar Singh on 27 March, 2014 CBI vs Awadhesh Kumar Singh IN