Harbans Lal and Sham Sunder Lal vide registered sale deed
dated 28.04.1976. According to sale deed, the dimensions of
the plot in question is shown ... dated 01.05.2000 in favour of plaintiff to
be null and void. Since the sale deed dated 29.09.1998 was not
the subject matter of dispute between
mortgagor/respondent no.1 in lieu of the
mortgage deed being illegal and void ab-initio
in law?
iii) Whether the rent deed executed ... could have any bearing in
the absence of any rent deed, being illegal and
void ab-initio?
v) Whether the appellant is tenant of respondent
ground that once the sale deed dated 23.6.1972 was illegal, null
and void, the decree for pre-emption was also null and void ... Bharpai and mutation No.2237
dated 3.2.1975 was fictitious, null and void. Sale deed dated
9.12.1975, executed by Bharpai in favour of defendant, was also
Plaintiff filed a suit for declaration seeking to get the gift
deed dated 19.04.2010 cancelled which was executed by
defendant No.1 in favour ... daughter-in-law of the plaintiff. The gift
deed was claimed to be illegal, null and void on the ground that
Piara Lal was owner
sale deed dated 01.06.2000
registered in the office of Sub-Registrar was declared to be
illegal, null and void without consideration and fraudulent. Suit ... sale deed Ex.PW4/A did not carry the
thumb impressions of the plaintiff at the relevant spaces and
execution of sale deed
land vide registered sale deed
dated 13.10.2004 in favour of defendant No.2 without any legal
necessity. Sale deed has been assailed on the ground ... questionable habits. The sale deed has
been claimed to be null and void as the plaintiff along with defendant
No.1 and proforma defendants
plaintiffs. Sale deed dated
19.02.1958 by Kotu Ram was denied. Defendants claimed to
have purchased the suit property as per sale deed dated ... Whether the sale-deed dated 15.09.2000 and
mutation No.2386 dated 09.10.2000 are illegal,
null and void and not binding on the rights
sale deed no.7398 dated 11-10-2006 in
favour of defendant no.4 and sale deed no.7399 dated 11-
10-2006 in favour ... executing the
sale deed in favour of the defendants no.2 to 5 is illegal,
null and void and not binding upon the rights
sale deed dated 13.02.2012.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the
plaintiff filed a suit for declaration challenging the sale deed
dated ... deed was executed by
defendant No.5 fraudulently on behalf of the plaintiff. The sale
deed was claimed to be illegal, null and void. Another
mutation No.651 dated 24.02.1998 were claimed to be illegal, null
and void.
[4]. Plaintiff also alleged that on the basis of wrong revenue
entries ... sale deed dated
11.10.1999. Defendant No.1-Sher Singh sold 8 marlas of land
situated at Rewari to defendant No.11 vide sale deed
