Premakumari executed a Settlement Deed in favour of the third
respondent-mother of the writ petitioner on 20.01.2005. The said Settlement
Deed was registered ... Deed was challenged by the writ
petitioner in OS No.546 of 2013 to declare that the cancellation of
Settlement Deed is null and void
Premakumari executed a Settlement Deed in favour of the third
respondent-mother of the writ petitioner on 20.01.2005. The said Settlement
Deed was registered ... Deed was challenged by the writ
petitioner in OS No.546 of 2013 to declare that the cancellation of
Settlement Deed is null and void
settlement deed dated 15.04.1991. In fact
the said Balasubramania Karaiyalar never executed any such
settlement deed, during his lifetime and the alleged settlement deed ... Balasubramania
Karaiyalar executed a settlement deed in favour of the first
defendant through settlement deed dated 15.04.1991. The said
settlement deed was stoutly denied
date of registered gift settlement deed,
the cancellation deed was executed. Therefore, the said cancellation
deed is void and non est.
35. In a case ... gift settlement deed. Therefore, the registered
cancellation deed said to have been executed by donor to cancel the
earlier registered gift settlement deed
settlement deed-ExB2 was a forged document and also to include a
prayer for declaring that the settlement deed dated 25.04.1996 as null
and void ... reject the settlement deed and the
plaintiffs have clearly in paragraph no.10A of the plaint stated that the
settlement deed dated
That apart, the
settlement deed did not contain that the fifth respondent shall maintain the
petitioner, failing which, the settlement deed will be cancelled ... though no consideration was
passed for execution of settlement deed, the consideration for executing the
settlement deed is based on human conduct, caring and conscious
short) for treating that settlement-
deed as void. Since the Third Respondent had undertaken to pay maintenance to
the Petitioner, the Second Respondent by Proceedings ... 1325/2022/Aa dated 13.02.2023 had refused to treat that settlement-
deed as void, which is assailed in this Writ Petition.
3. It is clear
executed any settlement deed, further the
alleged settlement deed was also cancelled by the Nachimuthu gounder
under Deed No.1860/97 dated on 02.06.97. Therefore ... settlement deed.
There cannot be any unilateral cancellation of settlement deed. Any
unilateral cancellation of settlement deed is void. Further, the settlement
deed would
power deed.
The said release deed was dated 11.06.2014. The first respondent seeks a
declaration that subsequent settlement deed was void only on the ground ... petitioner executed a settlement deed in favour of second
petitioner. If release deed held to be invalid, automatically, the
settlement deed impugned in the suit
power deed.
The said release deed was dated 11.06.2014. The first respondent seeks a
declaration that subsequent settlement deed was void only on the ground ... petitioner executed a settlement deed in favour of second
petitioner. If release deed held to be invalid, automatically, the
settlement deed impugned in the suit
