tested and
decided whether it is a void or voidable document. Moreover, in the
plaint, the plaintiffs specifically allege that they are in peaceful
possession ... decided only on evidence, to be a void or
voidable document.”
20. The above judgment is not factually applicable to the present case
together taken into consideration the same clearly prove the fact that the documents on both sides viz., plaintiff and defendants came into existence only when ... defendant got the property registered in their name. Of course those documents are voidable in nature it is for the first defendant to avoid those
together taken into consideration the same clearly prove the fact that the documents on both sides viz., plaintiff and defendants came into existence only when ... defendant got the property registered in their name. Of course those documents are voidable in nature it is for the first defendant to avoid those
property belonging to the minor is not void and it
is voidable, at the instance of the minor. When the parties are entering into ... only voidable as the issue is between the purchaser and the seller, Registrar has
no power to refuse to register such document.
10. Such view
holder or the person who is
in occupation of the property. The documents filed by the defendants clearly
indicate that he has paid the sale ... whom the written instrument is void or voidable, he has to seek declaration to
avoid such document or cancel the document
declares to be fraudulent.”
15. Therefore, unless the documents fall within the
ambit of fraud, such document cannot be cancelled by mere
complaint before ... that
the fraud at the most renders the transaction voidable not
void. Any such document result of fraud must be challenged
within a period
declares to be fraudulent.”
15. Therefore, unless the documents fall within the ambit
of fraud, such document cannot be cancelled by mere
complaint before ... that the
fraud at the most renders the transaction voidable not void.
Any such document result of fraud must be challenged within a
period
Therefore, unless the documents fall within the ambit of fraud, such
document cannot be cancelled by mere complaint before the Sub-Registrar. It
is also ... that the fraud at the most renders the transaction voidable not
void. Any such document result of fraud must be challenged within a period
declares
to be fraudulent.”
15. Therefore, unless the documents fall within the ambit of
fraud, such document cannot be cancelled by mere complaint
before ... that the fraud at the
most renders the transaction voidable not void. Any such
document result of fraud must be challenged within a period
declares
to be fraudulent.”
15. Therefore, unless the documents fall within the ambit
of fraud, such document cannot be cancelled by mere complaint
before ... that the fraud at the
most renders the transaction voidable not void. Any such
document result of fraud must be challenged within a period
