such an insimimeni is
effect of informing
at large that such a document
PO
poms
ri
oe
Jone ... since they are
constructive notice to the plaintif and hence. t
voidable documents. The plaintiif has
for cross-examination. The evidence
with regard to character and contents of the document.
Therefore, Ex.P. 1 is a void document and it does not convey
anything ... document and as to Its contents. Where the
misrepresentation is merely In respect of the
contents of the document, the transaction
becomcs voidable. Where
C Ramesh vs The Bangalore Development Authority on 25 January, 2011
Author: B.V.Nagarathna
natural i
justice. Fraudulently | obtainec:, appointment :
orders could be legitimately treated as: voidable: at
the option of the employ yer and could be 'reealied ... workman to have obtained an appointment by
fraudulent means. by producing forged document /
academic. documents, "disentitling the workman. to
equitable consideration or relief
Bangalore Metropolitan Transport ... vs B Mariswamy on 20 June, 2011
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy
Bench
Sri J S Manjunath vs The Divisional Controller on 18 August, 2011
Author: Ram Mohan
