Jam Shri Staji Digvijaysingji And Ors. vs Daud Taiyab And Ors. on 22 August, 1977
Thereafter the question was considered as to the voluntary coverage given by the Insurance Company to the extent of Rs. 15,000/- by covering even
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 95 (0.90 seconds)Employee State Insurance Corporation vs H K Acharya And Company on 7 October, 2022
2022
4.2) Learned Senior Advocate Mr.Soparker has
submitted that the voluntary coverage of the
opponent-under under the EPF Act does
Gujarat vs Regional on 25 March, 2011
stated int eh Appeal memo that the Appellant applied for Voluntary
Coverage as per Section 1(4) . The Commissioner authorised to cover
the establishment retrospectively
Unjha Pragati Mandal Through Secretary vs Union Of India on 9 April, 2024
contends that the Principal
of the appellant establishment had applied for
voluntary coverage without any instructions of the
management. No notification under Section ... High Court of Madras. In the said case, the
application for voluntary coverage was withdrawn
and thereafter the RPFC after lapse of one year
Assistant vs Remya on 10 April, 2012
disputed that the appellant applied for voluntary coverage
the order reveal that the assessment was made on the basis of gate
pass issued. Such passes
Crystal vs Regional on 12 July, 2011
that without prejudice to the dispute they have no objection
for voluntary coverage under section 1 (4) of the Act with effect
from the date
Binaben vs State on 27 August, 2010
deductions, such as, Rs.1539/- for
provident fund. Again Rs.1539/- towards voluntary provident fund and
Rs.2552/- towards LIC etc. Such total deduction comes ... voluntary
deductions and contributions to the savings of the respondent No.2,
such as, provident fund, voluntary provident fund and LIC coverage
Dilipsinhji D. Rathod vs Vijaysinh Parmar on 4 July, 1991
institution and should not send any information or news about private or voluntary institutions. Second memorandum is as regards decrease in exhibition of film shows ... third memo is about his attending a private function and news coverage based on his attending such functions and the fourth memo is that
Employees vs Jai on 21 August, 2008
voluntary transfer by an employer. Otherwise the Section would have
been framed differently.
If
the legislature did not intend to restrict the applicability or
coverage
Gohil Rameshbhai Amarsinh vs Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd on 15 September, 2022
Gohil Rameshbhai Amarsinh vs Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd on 15 September, 2022
Author: Biren Vaishnav