judgment of the Principal Bench of the Tribunal in Jagdish Kumar Vs. GNCT of Delhi and ors., OA No.2353/2006 decided on 5.10.2007 according ... Anand. Applicants are also relying on Raja Ram Vs. Speaker of Lok Sabha , 2007 (3) SCC 184, according to which edited footage cannot be relied
Supreme
Court in the case of Raja Ram vs. Speaker of Lok Sabha ,
2007 (3) SCC 184 wherein it was held that the edited
footage
learned counsel has also relied upon the case of R.M.Ramual Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others (1989 (1) SCC 285) wherein ... referred to the case of Dr. Kashinath G. Jalmi and another Vs. The Speaker and others (1993 (2) SCC 703. In this case
fact in STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. PRABHU reported in 1994 (2) SCC 481 and ANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS.GAR-RE ROLLING MILLS ... delay the Hon'ble Apex Court held in KASHINATH VS THE SPEAKER reported in 1993 (2) SCC 703 that the general judicial trend
Devendra Swaroop Saksena vs Union Of India Through Its Secretary on 19 December, 2014
Central
Apex Court in case Ram Singh and Others Vs. Col . Ram
Singh AIR 1986 SC 3 wherein it was held as under:-
"32. Thus ... recorded
statement may be stated as follows:
1) The voice of the speaker must be duly
identified by the maker of the record
A. K. Jain S/O P. R. Jain vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi Through
Manoranjan Kumar vs Union Of India Through on 25 February, 2009
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL
Francis John Arahna S/O Gerald Arahna vs Union Of India Through on 2 February
Rohit Choudhary vs Union Of India Through on 15 April, 2009
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL
