that time, there was no provision for
bringing any watch modules in the guise of house hold articles
since, it was banned articles ... evidence
PW-1 has deposed that majority of the goods like watches,
watch modules and perfumes etc., were in commercial quantity.
Further, he has deposed
Kamleshkumar Ishwardas Patel Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Ors. Etc. Etc on 17
required to be 'zealously watched and enforced by the Court'. Their rigour cannot be modulated on the basis of the nature
immediately intercepted the suitcase at the baggage examination counter at Module-2 and kept watch thereon. At that time the appellant came towards the baggage
required to be "jealously watched and enforced by the Court". Their rigour cannot be modulated on the basis of the nature
Constitution of India provides safeguard which are required to be "zealously watched and enforced by the Court". The relevant portion of the aforesaid ... required to be "zealously watched and enforced by the Court". Their rigour cannot be modulated on the basis of the nature
safeguards are required to be 'zealously watched and enforced by the Court. Their rigour cannot be modulated on the basis of the nature
Ashok Sadarangani vs State Of Punjab & Others on 27 March, 2014
CRWP No.117
Union Of India vs Meera Mohideen on 14 April, 1995
Author: S.C. Agrawal
Bench
required to be "zealously watched and enforced by the Court". Their rigor cannot be modulated on the basis of the nature
