that time, there was no provision for
bringing any watch modules in the guise of house hold articles
since, it was banned articles ... evidence
PW-1 has deposed that majority of the goods like watches,
watch modules and perfumes etc., were in commercial quantity.
Further, he has deposed
Port shows that he was on duty at departure baggages examination hall. Module II. Sahar Airport. He was there for checking cases of smuggling, dealing ... appellant was also suspected from his behaviour and hence he kept watch along with his colleagues on the appellant. The bag of the appellant
turned on his assailant; and that not factitiously, or in order to watch his opportunity, but from a real tenderness of shedding his brother ... that decision.
But a man who is assaulted is not bound to modulate his defence step by step according to the attack, before there
Manoj Pratap Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 24 June, 2022
Author: Dinesh Maheshwari
Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod vs State Of Gujarat on 27 April, 2009
Author: Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Amish Devgan vs Union Of India on 7 December, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2020 SC
Ankush Maruti Shinde & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 30 April, 2009
Equivalent citations
Sunil Tyagi vs Govt Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr on 28 June, 2021
Equivalent
Badri vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 November, 1975
Equivalent citations: 1976 AIR 560, 1976
State vs Sunil Batra Alias Bobby on 23 February, 1978
Equivalent citations: ILR1978DELHI536
JUDGMENT
S
