submitted that after the expiry of two years of the
arbitrator entering upon the reference, extension could not and cannot be granted
beyond further period ... read thus:
"2. The learned Counsel submitted that the Arbitrator entered a
reference on 30-8-2001 and therefore in terms of clause
Corporation objecting to an award made by
the Arbitrator on 24.03.1995. The Arbitrator had entered a reference
of dispute referred to him by the Corporation ... wrongly exercised by the Arbitrator by passing an award more than
4 months after the Arbitrator entered reference. This finding is itself
brought about
Arbitrator, in an arbitration
proceeding between the appellant and the respondent no.1 IOCL.
2. The respondent no.2 was appointed as the Sole Arbitrator ... preferred by the appellant. The respondent no.2 Arbitrator
entered upon reference and directed the appellant to file its Statement of
Claim with supporting documents
order of Sub Judge First
Class, Jalandhar and the Arbitrator had entered reference on
19.8.1986. On the award being filed by the Arbitrator before ... Arbitrator to state that the award which he passed was an
enforceable award. The enforceability of the award arises by the fact
entering on reference
Annexure P-3) appointed Arbitrator who
was changed by the Court vide order dated 14.09.2004. The said
Arbitrator made award dated 11.02.2005 and sent ... held that the 1996 Act is applicable because the Arbitrator entered
into reference on 12.10.2004 and announced the award on
11.02.2005 while
well as copy of award.
34 When the Ld. Arbitrator entered the reference, notice dated 10.07.2010
was duly dispatched to the petitioners at their last ... said sale was not a
part of terms of reference to Ld. Arbitrator. Respondent was duly authorized to repossess the
financed vehicle and to sell
within 10 days of such change. It was also argued that Ld. Arbitrator on all the dates
specifically ordered for service of arbitral proceedings ... well as copy of award.
34 When the Ld. Arbitrator entered the reference, notice dated 02.04.2009
was duly dispatched to the respondent under Speed Post
well as copy of award.
34 When the Ld. Arbitrator entered the reference, notice dated 10.07.2010
was duly dispatched to the respondent under Speed Post ... said sale was not a
part of terms of reference to Ld. Arbitrator. Respondent was duly authorized to repossess the
financed vehicle and to sell
well as copy of award.
34 When the Ld. Arbitrator entered the reference, notice dated 10.07.2010
was duly dispatched to the petitioners at their last ... said sale was not a
part of terms of reference to Ld. Arbitrator. Respondent was duly authorized to repossess the
financed vehicle and to sell
well as copy of award.
34 When the Ld. Arbitrator entered the reference, notice dated 10.07.2010
was duly dispatched to the respondent under Speed Post ... said sale was not a
part of terms of reference to Ld. Arbitrator. Respondent was duly authorized to repossess the
financed vehicle and to sell
