admission and consideration
of circumstantial evidence has been explained by Wigmore on
Evidence in paragraph 32 et seq. The test for the admissibility
of evidence
Thukral Mechanical Works vs Pm Diesels Private Limited & Anr on 6 February, 2026
Author
Mumbai Metropolitan Region ... vs Mumbai Metro One Private Limited on 24 February, 2026
2026:BHC
National Asset Reconstruction Company ... vs Mumbai Metropolitan Region ... on 24 February, 2026
2026:BHC-OS
Evidence p. 397 and p. 398;
Phipson Evidence 7th Edn. p. 546; Wigmore's Evidence p. 2406.) It has
been best described by Wigmore
Nasimuddin Fakruddin Kazi vs State Of Gujarat on 1 May, 2026
Author: Gita Gopi
Bench
John Henry Wigmore [John Henry Wigmore and the Rules
of Evidence: The Hidden Origins of Modern Law] on Evidence
states as follows:
"The peculiar
acts or immediately
thereafter. The aforesaid rule as it is stated in
Wigmore's Evidence Act reads thus:
"Under the present exception
noteworthy because it is an
outstanding example of a creative generalization. As Wigmore writes, this epoch-making judgment
owes much of its strength
Rajesh Jain (Supra), which reads as under :-
"38. John Henry Wigmore on Evidence states as follows:
"The peculiar effect of the presumption
