conviction and sentence of the other non-
appearing accused left undisturbed. [760E]
Wigmore on Evidence: 3rd Editition Vol. VII para 2054,
Rex v. Bhaskerville ... recognise the distinction between 'competency' and 'credit',
Wigmore says: Wigmore on Evidence: 3rd Edition Vol. VII para
such incidence David H. Kaye
and other authors in ‘The New Wigmore A Treatise on Evidence – Expert
Evidence’ (2004 Edition) opined as under :
“The district
King John, Act V, Scene IV.)
18. Both Taylor and Wigmore in their treatise
on Evidence took refuge to the magic of
Shakespeare to illustrate ... there should be
no chance of operation of worldly motives. (See
Wigmore on Evidence page 233-234).
26. This Court in Kishan Lal
Vs. State
Judge to the Jury in a passage which occurs in Wigmore on Evidence (7th Vol. - Third Edn. at page 328) which reads as under
there is not the slightest doubt about his guilt."
(1) Wigmore on Evidence Vol. III para 1009.
(2j Wigmere Vol. III para
King John, Act V, Scene IV.)
of
18. Both Taylor and Wigmore in their treatise
on Evidence took refuge to the magic of
Shakespeare ... there should be no
chance of operation of worldly motives. (See
Wigmore on Evidence page 233-234).
::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017
Mohd. Shafique Pahalwan And Ors. vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 August, 2000
Equivalent
Judge to the Jury in a passage which occurs in Wigmore on
Evidence (3rd Edn., Vol. 7 at p. 328) which reads as
under
King John, Act V, Scene iv.)
9
25. Both Taylor and Wigmore in their treatise on
Evidence took refuge to the magic of Shakespeare ... there should be no chance
of operation of worldly motives. (See Wigmore on
Evidence page 233-234).
35. This Court in Kishan Lal Vs. State
acts
or immediately thereafter. The aforesaid rule as it is stated in Wigmore's
Evidence Act reads thus:—
“Under the present exception [to hearsay
