Nageshwar Pandit @ N. Pandit vs The State Of Jharkhand on 16 April, 2026
Rajesh Jain (Supra), which reads as under :-
"38. John Henry Wigmore on Evidence states as follows:
"The peculiar effect of the presumption
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.34 seconds)Purushottam Prasad Sharma vs The State Of Jharkhand on 21 April, 2026
without expecting the complainant to
do anything further.
"38. John Henry Wigmore on Evidence
states as follows: "The peculiar effect of the
presumption
Md. Masudul Haque Ansari @ M. H. Ansari vs The State Of Jharkhand on 7 May, 2026
said judgment is relevant,
which reads as follows.:-
"38. John Henry Wigmore on Evidence states as follows:
"The peculiar effect of the presumption
Pradeep Kumar Saha @ Pradip Kumar Saha vs The State Of Jharkhand on 22 April, 2026
said judgment is relevant,
which reads as follows.:-
"38. John Henry Wigmore on Evidence states as follows:
"The peculiar effect of the presumption
Pradeep Kumar Saha @ Pradip Kumar Saha vs The State Of Jharkhand on 22 April, 2026
said judgment is relevant,
which reads as follows.:-
"38. John Henry Wigmore on Evidence states as follows:
"The peculiar effect of the presumption
Pradeep Kumar Saha @ Pradip Kumar Saha vs The State Of Jharkhand on 22 April, 2026
said judgment is relevant,
which reads as follows.:-
"38. John Henry Wigmore on Evidence states as follows:
"The peculiar effect of the presumption
1