Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

hand and the accused on the other. 42. In "Wigmore on Evidence" (Vol IV para 1051) it has been observed : "An admission

attempt on his life, is relevant to show that he murdered B. Wigmore on Evidence, 'Vol. 1, Paragraph 118, page 558, quotes Woodruff ... perpetrator or instigator"; Chief Justice Swift, Evidence, 136: quoted by Wigmore in paragraph 105 at page 538. In -- 'R. v. Ball

State vs Padma Kant Malviya And Anr. on 28 September, 1953 Equivalent citations: AIR1954ALL523, 1955CRILJ904

Secondly there is a duty (called "testimonial duty," by Wigmore) in every man to give evidence arising out of the right ... control which can serve the ascertainment of the truth." See Wigmore on Evidence, 3rd edition, paragraphs 2192 and 2194. It was pointed

State vs Padma Kant Malviya And Anr. on 28 September, 1953 Equivalent citations: 1954CRILJ1141, AIR

Rishi Kesh Singh And Ors. vs The State on 18 October, 1968 Equivalent citations: AIR1970ALL51

expounded by George F. Canfield, Robert Hill Freeman, John Henry Wigmore and Cardozo among other Jurists. The Blackstonian theory is, however, taken to have become

Helvering v. Hallock, (1939) 84 Law Ed 604 at p. 812. Wigmore states that one of the shortcomings in juducial decision is undue servitude ... bondage of precedent; see Vol. 1 Wigmore on Evidence, third edition, paragraph 8a. An overruling does not, in theory change the law, but only vindicates

decided by the supreme Court of Missouri, reported in Wigmore's Select Cases on the Law of Torts, Vol. II, at p. 572, where ... neither case is he liable to this kind of action: Wigmore's Select Cases on the Law of Torts

Austin and other jurists, namely, George F. Canfield Robert Hillfreman, J. H. Wigmore and Cardozo who propounded the doctrine of prospective overruling. Blackstone ... Bingham v. Miller, (1848) 17 Chio 445 and was referred to by Wigmore in his editorial preface to Science of Legal Method (9 Modern Legal