course has never been taken by a judge before ."
15. Professor Wigmore in his Treaise not he Anglo- American System of Evidence , Volume ... principle and down by edmund burke.
16. At page 268 Professor Wigmore concludes his discussion b stating "that a trial judge
involved in it and knit up
with the statement." See Wigmore on
Evidence, Art. 1465."
42
In the above said case, statements
trustworthines's.VV"':'4:'-..l"-
(Wigmore on evidence 1546). it"
however, an element of self... ir1te1
High Court Of Karnataka vs Syed Mohammed Ibrahim on 17 December, 2014
Bench: N.Kumar
High Court Of Karnataka vs Izher Baig on 17 December, 2014
Bench: N.Kumar , Rathnakala
High Court Of Karnataka vs Syed Muneeruddin Mulla on 17 December, 2014
Bench: N.Kumar
acts or
immediately thereafter. The aforesaid rule
as it is stated in Wigmore's Evidence
Act reads thus:
"Under the present exception
acts or
immediately thereafter. The aforesaid rule
as it is stated in Wigmore's Evidence
Act reads thus:
"Under the present exception
acts or
immediately thereafter. The aforesaid rule
as it is stated in Wigmore's Evidence
Act reads thus:
"Under the present exception
thereafter. The aforesaid rule as it is stated in
Wigmore's Evidence Act reads thus:--
"Under the present exception [to hearsay] an
utterance
