They will own the Second Floor jointly and the
entire cost of construction will be met by them equally and jointly. As they
will ... same
was constructed by him in conformity with the Will/codicil/fam-
ily agreement. Ld. Counsel further argued that Plaintiff Defend
said Will, Late Sh. S.P. Khanna did not name
any person as Executor of either the Will dated 20.04.1999 or
Will/ Codicil dated ... Will in the Court
in Judicial File. They deposed that they are the attesting witness
in the said Will. They deposed that the Will/ Codicil
another witness PW3/ Sh. J.M. Manchanda, a witness to codicil/ Will.
Then, evidence was closed.
5.2 There is no evidence of respondent ... Will
but its contents are in continuation of Will (Ex. PW2/1), therefore, the said
Will Ex. PW3/1 is treated as Codicil
Swarup executed a will during his lifetime
in his sound disposing mind on 10.8.1990. It was a handwritten will
and codicil and both the documents ... Singhal on the codicil
also. The codicil is Ex.PW3/2. The will as well as the codicil were
witnessed by the same witnesses
Will cancelled by execution of
registered deed of revocation of the first Will.
(78) The Will in question is a registered Will. In the Will ... unprivileged Will. Afterwards, A
being entitled to make a privileged Will makes a
privileged Will, which purports to revoke his
unprivileged Will. This is a revocation
will not prove that the Will mark X filed
before the Court is the same Will which has been mentioned in the
codicil, further ... there is mention of will dated
23.03.1980 in that codicil. However, proving this codicil will not
amount to proof of the Will as required under
will dated 13.04.2007 was the last and
final will of the testator and by executing the said will, all other
previous wills and codicils stood ... will has seen the
testator signing the will. There is no requirement that the witness
should have read the will/codicil before signing the same
grant of Letters of Administration with Will annexed in
the matter of Will dated 15.10.2007 and Codicil dated 20.06.2012
of late Dr. Yogesh Cander Verma ... dated 15.10.2007
by executing a Codicil dated 20.06.2012.
5 It is stated that the Codicil dated 20.06.2012 of the
Will dated 15.10.2007 was got drafted
parcel of the Will and is normally executed
to clarify or to change some terms and conditions of original Will. Codicil
does not supercedes ... inadvertently
wordings of Codicil point out its existence as on the date of execution of
Codicil. Otherwise also when this Codicil has been relied
regarding genuineness of
the Will & codicil which are not required to be framed as codicil, Will and
trust has not been challenged ... which was dissolved and therefore while
dealing with the issue of Will/Codicil, Hon'ble High Court held in order
dated 04.04.2004 that
