Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1684 (2.70 seconds)

Mohanlal K. Shah (Huf) vs Ito on 22 September, 2004

Recognisable or acceptable partition of HUF under Income Tax law. 33. As regards the partition falling under category No. (i), a partition is a mere ... coparcenary will not, by itself, be sufficient to bring the matter of jointness to an end, that is, it will not amount to partition
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 36 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Ved Parkash Loona vs Income-Tax Officer on 12 August, 1994

coparceners surviving 'the deceased-coparcener and the coparcenary will continue till a partition is effected. However, the coparcenary property will not include the interest ... partition in Explanation 1 to Section 6 is only for the limited purpose of deducting the share of the deceased-coparcener and that partition will
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Amritsar Cites 16 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Bhagat Singh vs Income-Tax Officer on 20 November, 1982

point arose, whether the properties received at the time of the partition will bear the character of the joint family property or will become ... regarding exclusion of income from property acquired by him on partition, the same will be granted to the assessee. 35. In the result, the appeal
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next