Court below in the said GWOP, to the effect that the unregistered Will dated 17.03.2008 marked on the side of the Objectors is surrounded ... marked as Ex.R.1 to Ex.P.8, including the unregistered Will dated 17.03.2008 as Ex.R.6.
8.The Trial Court, after analysing
bequeathed item Nos.1 to 14 in her favour by the unregistered Will Ex.B29 dated 10.12.1975. Inasmuch as the plaintiff Sampath was motherless ... being the propounder of the Will was enjoined to prove the unregistered Will to the satisfaction of the court. As a sequela
Court below in the said GWOP, to the effect that the unregistered Will dated 17.03.2008 marked on the side of the Objectors is surrounded ... marked as Ex.R.1 to Ex.P.8, including the unregistered Will dated 17.03.2008 as Ex.R.6.
8.The Trial Court, after analysing
absolute owner of ‘A’ and ‘B’ Schedule
properties and, therefore, the unregistered Will, said to have been
executed by Adhilakshmiammal cannot be the basis ... Will, Ex.P-2. Mere registration
of a Will cannot be a ground to accept the authenticity of the Will, in
the light
Gothawari Sureka. On 24.11.1999, the said
Gothawari Sureka executed an unregistered Will bequeathing the second schedule
property in favour of the plaintiff ... Will dated 19.11.1999 executed
by Smt. Gothawari Devi Sureka or the unregistered Will dated
24.11.1999 alleged to have been executed by Smt.Gothawari Devi
Sureka
Gothawari Sureka. On 24.11.1999, the said
Gothawari Sureka executed an unregistered Will bequeathing the second schedule
property in favour of the plaintiff ... Will dated 19.11.1999 executed
by Smt. Gothawari Devi Sureka or the unregistered Will dated
24.11.1999 alleged to have been executed by Smt.Gothawari Devi
Sureka
Gothawari Sureka. On 24.11.1999, the said
Gothawari Sureka executed an unregistered Will bequeathing the second schedule
property in favour of the plaintiff ... Will dated 19.11.1999 executed
by Smt. Gothawari Devi Sureka or the unregistered Will dated
24.11.1999 alleged to have been executed by Smt.Gothawari Devi
Sureka
absolute owner of ‘A’ and ‘B’ Schedule
properties and, therefore, the unregistered Will, said to have been
executed by Adhilakshmiammal cannot be the basis ... Will, Ex.P-2. Mere registration
of a Will cannot be a ground to accept the authenticity of the Will, in
the light
Will in respect of
his half share, even assuming the Will is not valid that would not confer right
on the plaintiff. Will was duly ... created will after the death of the
Sankaragounder, in other words, Ex.A14-Will is alleged to be a “posthumous
manufactured unregistered Will” dated
Will in respect of
his half share, even assuming the Will is not valid that would not confer right
on the plaintiff. Will was duly ... created will after the death of the
Sankaragounder, in other words, Ex.A14-Will is alleged to be a “posthumous
manufactured unregistered Will” dated
