Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994
person to stand or not to stand as or to withdraw or not to withdraw from being, a candidate or to vote at an election
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 219 (1.18 seconds)Dr. P. Nalla Thampy Thera vs B.L. Shanker & Others on 28 October, 1983
appearance or
non-prosecution whether can be treated on par with
withdrawal of abatement.
Interpretation of Statutes.
Presumption that legislature takes notice of court
decisions ... court allowed the deletion. Later Respondent No. 29
filed a memorandum for withdrawal of the prayer of
recrimination against Respondent No. 5. After the court
Basudeb Narayan Singh And Ors. vs Shesh Narayan Singh And Ors. on 19 May, 1978
application is directed against an order refusing leave to the plaintiffs to withdraw their suit and transposing the defendants to the category of plaintiffs ... category of the plaintiffs in case the plaintiffs wanted to withdraw the suit. It appears from the order sheet that the petition was not moved
Registrar, Manonmaniam Sundaranar ... vs Suhura Beevi Educational Trust And ... on 20 January, 1994
pressing the above suit, it became necessary for the petitioner to withdraw the suit and, therefore, the hearing may be advanced to enable the petitioner ... plaintiff to withdraw the same. Notice appears to have been ordered to defendants 1 and 2 alone who were made respondents in the said petition
Smt. Gowramma vs Nanjappa And Ors. on 17 August, 2001
plaintiff and therefore, plaintiff in the suit cannot be permitted to withdraw the suit and thereby deny her legitimate share. After hearing the parties ... plaintiffs, a suit cannot be dismissed and when she objected to the withdrawal of the suit, the Court could not have dismissed the suit
Patel Dineshbhai Mohanbhai vs Decd. Naranbhai Ramdas Thro' Legal ... on 23 September, 2004
Judge (S.D.) Vadodara, by which the learned Judge has rejected the withdrawal pursis filed by the applicants of this Civil Revision Application ... application (pursis) at Exh.59, requesting the Court to allow them to withdraw the suit unconditionally. In the withdrawal pursis, an averment is made
V.E.A.R.M. Annamalai Chettiar vs Koothappudayar And Ors. on 19 October, 1932
petition I.A. No. 1226 of 1928 unconditionally withdrawing from the suit. Of the four groups of defendants, only the Official Receiver (defendant 27) representing ... complete compromise of the suit after which the plaintiff could not withdraw. To effectuate this objection he on 4th December filed his own petition
Jethiben vs Maniben And Anr. on 18 March, 1983
plaintiff, and the plaintiff of that suit who wanted to withdraw the suit should be transposed as defendant No. 2.
2. The case ... present. Ultimately, after various adiournments on 12-10-1982 a withdrawal pursis was given by present opponent No. 1 (original plaintiff) under Order 23, Rule
Md. Muzahid vs John Wilson Zedak And Anr. on 5 July, 1988
party No, 1 as plaintiff filed an application for allowing him to withdraw Title Suit No. 206 of 1982 as opposite party ... allowed the prayer of opposite party No. 1 for withdrawal of the suit and refused the prayer of the petitioner. It may be mentioned that
Smt. Gowramma vs Nanjappa And Ors. on 17 August, 2001
plaintiff and therefore, plaintiff in the suit cannot be permitted to withdraw the suit and thereby deny her legitimate share. After hearing the parties ... plaintiffs, a suit cannot be dismissed and when she objected to the withdrawal of the suit, the Court could not have dismissed the suit