dated 30.8.1998, the original punishment dated 21.6.1995 was modified into one of stoppage of increment for a period of 3 months without cumulative effect ... crucial date was 1.4.1996, was passed over due to the punishment dated 21.6.1995 of stoppage of increment for one year without cumulative effect which
stoppage of one grade increment without cumulative effect vide order dated, 23.12.92.
7. In Writ Petition No. 165/94, petitioner Bheru Lal Jeengar has also ... penalty from stoppage of two increments without cumulative effect to one grade increment without cumulative effect. On the basis of the another notice issued
cannot be made effective retrospectively. He has
also argued that 'without cumulative effect' means without
any other effect and, therefore, by any stretch ... that the penalty imposed without cumulative
effect, once has turned and transformed into major penalty
with cumulative effect and in fact, second independent
penalty itself
The Director Of School Education vs M. Velayutham on 2 June, 2023
Author: R. Mahadevan
The Director Of School Education vs M. Velayutham on 2 June, 2023
Author: R. Mahadevan
stoppage of increment for 3 months without cumulative effect by the second respondent vide his proceedings dated 29.02.2012. In view of this, the third respondent ... stoppage of increment for a period of three months without cumulative effect vide proceedings dated 29.02.2012 is not entitled to get the promotion through
order of punishment of stoppage of one
increment without cumulative effect vide order dated 28.09.2005. Another
charge sheet dated 28.02.2006 was served on the petitioner ... although
the order of punishment of stoppage of one increment without cumulative
effect is dated 28.09.2005, however, the same has come into effect
reduced to two
increments without cumulative effect instead of stoppage of three
increments with cumulative effect; against order dated 20.5.2016,
punishment was reduced ... increment without cumulative
effect against stoppage of two increments without cumulative
effect; and appeal against order D.O.No.1256/2017 dated 3.8.2017
was dismissed
punishment of stoppage of the annual increment
without cumulative effect would relate back to the date of the
alleged misconduct and not the date ... punishment.
The effect of the stoppage of one year annual increment
without cumulative effect imposed on the petitioner vide order dated
period of two years without
cumulative effect vide order dated 04/06.09.1986. The appeal
preferred thereagainst was rejected ... period of two years without cumulative effect vide order
dated 04/06.09.1986, was available till the same was set aside
